Skip to content

WHO STOLE YOUR LOAN RADIO IS BACK! 7PM TONIGHT ON BLOG TALK RADIO!

February 20, 2014

DISCLAIMER: THE CONTENT IN THIS BLOG IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE MISCONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE! Anthony Martinez is a Litigation Discovery Expert, Consultant and Strategist. Neither Anthony Martinez nor his firm AMA engage in the practice of law and only provide Case Management Consulting (“CMC”) and Legal Process Outsourcing Services (“LPO”) to licensed practicing attorneys. AMA will provide public information only and will not provide any kind of advice, explanation, opinion, or recommendation to a consumer about possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options, selection of forms or strategies. Obtain the most advanced, state of the art FEAR Declarations (False Evidence Appearing Real), Securitization and Forensic Audit Analysis Reports and Professional Loan Note Examination Analysis and Audit Reports from e-Logic Group (www.e-logicgroup.com). Sign-up today for e-Logic Group’s INTRODUCTION – HOW TO BECOME A PROFESSIONAL LOAN NOTE EXAMINER. Lean more about AMA Global Group’s Reverse Debt Collection Platform and Services at www.amaglobalgroup.com. Tune in February 20, 2014 at 7pm this Thursday and listen to the controversial archive conversations of real property litigation with expert guests on Blog Talk Radio’s – Who Stole Your Loan Radio – Hosted by Anthony Martinez every Thursday at 7pm.  Look for up and coming Webinar Events  held every Tuesday and Florida Seminar Events held every Wednesday as Anthony Martinez talks specifically about Unlawful Foreclosure Fraud, Exposing the Fraud and How to Become a Professional Loan Note Examiner in addition to advanced discovery information, tactics and strategies to the Webinar and Seminar Circuit!

————————————————————————————–

Join me LIVE tonight at 7pm as I bring back WHO STOLE YOUR LOAN RADIO!  Tonight’s discussion is STRATEGY NO. 8:  HOW TO MAKE THE PLAINTIFF DANCE TO YOUR SONG! 

Servicer’s are accomplishing what should be an equitable subrogation action through an unlawful foreclosure action blindsiding the Courts and defense attorneys.  How do you effectively bring the right arguments to the Court and make the Plaintiff dance to your song?

In this episode I will discuss some of the best head scratching arguments raised including but not limited to:

– Shutting Down Opposing Counsel When The Plaintiff is Not Present;

– Ask Counsel Who Hired Them Your Honor?;

– Servicer for the Plaintiff?  Where’s the Proof?;

– Trustee?  Says Who?;

and much much more!

I will be bringing all my wittiness and sarcasm to the show.  See you tonight at 7pm sharp!

 

Advertisements
2 Comments leave one →
  1. Anne Bergstrom permalink
    February 20, 2014 2:08 pm

    Dear Great Anthony, Thank You. I will be on at 7. You are the Best! Blair

    >________________________________ > From: Discovery Tactics >To: bbtkc@bellsouth.net >Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 11:21 AM >Subject: [New post] WHO STOLE YOUR LOAN RADIO IS BACK! 7PM TONIGHT ON BLOG TALK RADIO! > > WordPress.com >Anthony Martinez posted: “DISCLAIMER: THE CONTENT IN THIS BLOG IS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE MISCONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE! Anthony Martinez is a Litigation Discovery Expert, Consultant and Strategist.Neither Anthony Martinez nor his firm AMA engage in the prac” >

  2. November 18, 2014 7:40 pm

    Anthony Martinez gives the best advice to a homeowner in distress and how to represent themselves as pro se and what to say when in front of a judge in the “lost note and mortgage foreclosure complaint without proof of where the NOTE went ,its actually right in front of the court and borrowers and judges that are being deceived by a debt collector that bought your loan for pennies on the dollar from a servicer .that was transferred your loan from the original lender thats not even in business anymore but through fabricated MERS assignments of mortgage has bought your defaulted loan back from a REMIC (REAL ESTATE MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CONDUIT) FROM THAT SO CALLED SERVICER who transferred rights to a debt collector on a dead non performing toxic asset that was already written of and reimbursed by the FDIC FOR 80% OF THE LOAN TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF THE REMIC THEN SOLD FOR 20% TO THE DEBT COLLECTOR WHO RE-ATTACHES THE DEAD NOTE TO THE MORTGAGE CALLED RE-ATTACTHMENT WHO GOES BACK TO THE COURTS AND CLAIM OWNERSHIP AS THE REAL PARTY IN INTEREST TO ATTEST TO THIS SCAM IS FREDDIE MAC WHO MADE THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT TO
    THE SUPREME TASK FORCE OF THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT WHEN ASKED TO PROVE THE Verification of “ownership” of the mortgage.and his answer was startling to hear the EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT OF FREDDIE MAC Robert E.
    Bostrom TELL THE TRUTH .

    FREDDIE MAC EXECUTIVE V.P. Robert E.Bostrom COMMENTS

    FREDDIE MACREVEALS THE underlying scam that the Banksters are using to foreclose today as it was when reported by :

    FREDDIEMAC COMMENTED TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
    WHEN ASKED about the: Verification of “ownership” of the mortgage.

    Florida Supreme Task Force on

    Residential Mortgage Foreclosure Cases

    The events as they happened

    Administrative Order. The Chief Justice established the task force
    in March 2009 by Administrative Order in the wake of dramatic increases in residential mortgage foreclosure case filings.

    Petition. The original Petition to amend the rules of court was filed
    with the Court on August 17, 2009.Comments were due by October 1, 2009.

    /2010/05/13/response-to-the-florida-supreme-court-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-civil-procedure-motion-for-rehearing/

    Comments from Robert E.
    Bostrom Freddie Mac’s Executive Vice
    President stated on

    Recommendation regarding verification of “ownership” of the mortgage“The Task Force has recommended a requirement for a plaintiff in
    a foreclosure action to verify that it owns and
    holds the note.

    “Typically, the plaintiff in
    a foreclosure action does not own the underlying note or
    loan that is secured by the property subject to the foreclosure proceeding. Freddie Mac’s servicers initiate foreclosure actions in their names, even though they are
    not the owners of the notes or loans in question, because they are the
    mortgagees as shown on the land records (by fraudulent, fabricated assignments) and they are the holders (not
    in due course) or
    otherwise in possession of the (fabricated) notes. During foreclosure proceedings, our servicers and foreclosure counsel have authority to negotiate
    and execute loan restructurings (against what the pooling and servicing
    agreements state?) and
    other foreclosure alternatives (trial
    modifications that are ultimately denied) with borrowers as well as attend (pointless) mediation. To
    require investors who do not service the loan to be a party in the foreclosure action and attend mediation would be costly
    and unduly burdensome (because they do not even know it is in
    default?), which may result in additional costs being
    passed on to the borrower. The intended purpose of the mediation program
    could be achieved effectively without this verification requirement.”

    Robert E. Bostrom
    Freddie Mac
    Executive Vice President
    General Counsel & Corporate Secretary

    This has not changed in today’s envirenment
    “the plaintiff in a foreclosure action does not own the Note or
    Loan”

    WE ARE FIGHTING THE SAME FIGHT EXCEPT THE PLAINTIFF IS FORGING
    ASSIGNMENTS AND SWEARING AND DOING EVERYTHING THEY CAN DO TO SAY THEY OWN THE LOAN
    WHEN WE GET A STATEMENT FROM FREDIE MAC’S VICE PRESIDENT WHO TELLS IT IN A
    MATTER OF FACT WAY
    REVEALING THE TRUTH TO THE WHOLE WORLD.

    NEXT IS THE COMMENT FROM THE FLORIDA
    BANKERS ASSOCIATION TO THE FLORIDA
    SUPREME

    COURT TASK FORCE ON FORECLOSURES.

    “It is a reality of commerce that virtually all paper documents related to a
    note and mortgage are converted to electronic files almost immediately after the loan is closed. Individual loans, as electronic data, are compiled
    into portfolios which are transferred to the secondary market,
    frequently as mortgage-backed securities.”

    “The reason “many firms file lost note counts as a standard alternative pleading in the
    complaint” is because
    the physical document was deliberately eliminated to avoid confusion immediately upon its
    conversion to an electronic file.”
    ___________________________________________________________

    THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT IS FEBRUARY 11, 2010 On February 11, 2010, the Florida 2.140 (D)
    Supreme Court Amended Rule 1.110(b) as well as Form 1.996(FinalJudgment of Foreclosure
    Form).The Amended rule 1.110(b) was amended to
    require verification of mortgage foreclosure complaints involving residential real property. The primary purpose of the Rule change was as follows:

    (1)To provided incentive for the plaintiff to appropriately investigate
    and verify its ownership of the note or right to
    enforce the note and ensure that the allegations in the complaint are accurate;

    (2)to conserve judicial
    resources that are currently being wasted on inappropriately
    pleaded “lost note” counts and inconsistent allegations;

    (3)to prevent the wasting of judicial resources and harm to defendants
    resulting from suits brought by
    plaintiffs not entitled to enforce the note;

    (4)to give trial courts greater authority to sanction plaintiffs who make false
    allegations.

    in a Verification of Debt to verify GAAP (Generally Acceptable ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES) sent to the ALLEGED LENDER To prove if they are the REAL PARTY OF INTEREST STATES:

    ‘plaintiff did not stipulate via affidavit that they are in
    fact a Creditor in this loan/security instrument. A creditor needs to show true
    accounting debits of the loss as a result of the issuance of the loan to
    defendent according to Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)
    Purchasing distressed Properties that have fatal breaks in Chain of title
    cannot be undone and lead to RESPA AND TILA VIOLATIONS.

    Since THE BANK
    CHOSE TO HAVE A DISTRIBUTED PARTY OF INTEREST SCHEME TO AVOID PAYING TAXES TWICE.THE BANKS PUT THESE LOANS INTO SPV’S(SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES)

    THIS IS COVERED
    UNDER INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
    860, THIS WAY ONLY THE SHAREHOLDERS ARE TAXED CALLED A PASS THROUGH FOR SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLES.

    That brings me
    to my petition for verification of debt on march 16,2014 asking for the
    plaintiff to prove that the lender as a CREDITOR and Owner in due course SHOW TRUE DOUBLE ENTRY GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING
    PRINCIPLES (GAAP). AND SINCE THE
    SHAREHOLDERS ARE THE ONLY ONES TAXED THEY ARE THE REAL BENEFICIAL PARTIES IN INTEREST.GMAC IS NOT THE REAL PARTY IN INTEREST AND NEITHER OCWEN OR GMAC HAS NO STANDING TO FORECLOSE ON THIS PROPERTY,BUT THEY DO IT ANYWAY BY DECEIT AND THOUSANDS OF OTHER PROPERTIES ARE FORECLOSED ON THE SAME WAY.

    To the extent
    that the plaintiff has been paid on the underlying obligation or has no legal
    interest therein or in the note or mortgage,or does not have lawful possession
    of the note or mortgage, plaintiff’s allegations of possession and capacity to
    institute foreclosure constitutes fraud upon the court.

    THEN LOOK AT THE DEFINATION OF iRC 860 AND FAS 140 AND WHEN YOU PUT THAT TOGETHER WITH GAAP YOU WILL SEE THEIR SCAM

    I FOUND A WEBSITE THAT GOES OVER THE STEPS THAT SHOW THE SCAM
    THE WAY THE BANKS DECEIVE THE COURTS ,THE JUDGES AND THE BORROWERS

    AT : :www.ohiomortgage review.com/history.html

    LOOK FOR THE KEY TERMS FAS 140 AND iRC 860

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: